PairBook
HomeGIS › GIS vs MDLZ

GIS vs MDLZ: Correlation

How closely do General Mills (GIS) and Mondelez International (MDLZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.51, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.51
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
215.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GIS and MDLZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the GIS/MDLZ correlation comes out at 0.51, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.44 over 1 year against 0.51 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.54, and annualized covariance runs at 215.4 %².

Among the 38 assets we track against GIS, MDLZ ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MDLZ ahead by 17.4 points (-12.8% versus +4.6%). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.41 and 0.74, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GIS vs MDLZ: side by side

GIS (General Mills)MDLZ (Mondelez International)
1-year return-12.8%+4.6%
5-year return-14.6%+14.7%
Volatility (ann.)20.6%20.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.050.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-53.4%-29.0%
Market cap$21.6B$79.7B
P/E (trailing)22.9
Dividend yield6.09%3.17%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
Higher yield: GIS 6.09% vs 3.17%Smaller drawdown: MDLZ -29.0% vs -53.4%Higher 5y return: MDLZ +14.7% vs -14.6%
-32%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GIS · MDLZ

Year-by-year returns

YearGISMDLZ
2022+28.1%+2.9%
2023-20.0%+11.2%
2024+1.4%-15.3%
2025-23.7%-7.0%
2026-8.8%+18.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GIS and MDLZ good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.51 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GIS and MDLZ?

The GIS/MDLZ correlation stands at 0.51 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.44, 5 years: 0.54), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MDLZ a good diversifier for GIS?

To a limited degree. At 0.51 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.51 mean?

A reading of 0.51 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gis-vs-mdlz.json

GIS vs MDLZ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.51GIS vs MDLZ0.51

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GIS vs MDLZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gis-vs-mdlz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gis-vs-mdlz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GIS correlations · MDLZ correlations