PairBook
HomeCPB › CPB vs GIS

CPB vs GIS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, The Campbell's Company (CPB) and General Mills (GIS) carry a correlation of 0.74, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.74
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.77
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.73
long-run
Ann. covariance
373.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CPB and GIS?

On 3 years of weekly data the CPB/GIS correlation comes out at 0.74, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.77 over 1 year against 0.74 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.73, and annualized covariance runs at 373.7 %².

In CPB's tracked universe of 20 assets, GIS sits right near the top at #1. On 12-month performance GIS holds a 10.0-point edge, -22.8% against -12.8%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CPB vs GIS: side by side

CPB (The Campbell's Company)GIS (General Mills)
1-year return-22.8%-12.8%
5-year return-30.8%-14.6%
Volatility (ann.)24.5%20.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.07-0.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-58.1%-53.4%
Market cap$21.6B
P/E (trailing)11.4
Dividend yield6.72%6.09%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: CPB 6.72% vs 6.09%Smaller drawdown: GIS -53.4% vs -58.1%Higher 5y return: GIS -14.6% vs -30.8%
-38%0%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CPB · GIS

Year-by-year returns

YearCPBGIS
2022+34.8%+28.1%
2023-21.5%-20.0%
2024+0.1%+1.4%
2025-30.5%-23.7%
2026-12.2%-8.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CPB and GIS good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.74 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CPB and GIS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.74 over 3 years, with 0.77 over the last year and 0.73 over 5 years.

Is GIS a good diversifier for CPB?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.74 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.74 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.74 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cpb-vs-gis.json

CPB vs GIS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.74CPB vs GIS0.74

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CPB vs GIS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cpb-vs-gis.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cpb-vs-gis/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CPB correlations · GIS correlations