PairBook
HomeCL › CL vs MDLZ

CL vs MDLZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Mondelez International (MDLZ) carry a correlation of 0.58, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.58
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.53
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.63
long-run
Ann. covariance
202.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CL and MDLZ?

Over the past 3 years, CL and MDLZ moved with a correlation of 0.58, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.53) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.63, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 202.4 %².

In CL's tracked universe of 40 assets, MDLZ sits right near the top at #3. The trailing year gives CL the advantage: +10.4% versus +4.6%, a 5.8-point spread. The rolling one-year correlation stayed in a tight band between 0.49 and 0.72 over the past three years, which points to a structural rather than episodic relationship.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CL vs MDLZ: side by side

CL (Colgate-Palmolive)MDLZ (Mondelez International)
1-year return+10.4%+4.6%
5-year return+32.0%+14.7%
Volatility (ann.)16.9%20.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.170.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.0%-29.0%
Market cap$72.5B$79.7B
P/E (trailing)36.222.9
Dividend yield2.27%3.17%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: MDLZ 22.9 vs 36.2Higher yield: MDLZ 3.17% vs 2.27%Higher 5y return: CL +32.0% vs +14.7%
-12%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CL · MDLZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCLMDLZ
2022-5.4%+2.9%
2023+3.8%+11.2%
2024+16.6%-15.3%
2025-11.0%-7.0%
2026+17.2%+18.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CL and MDLZ good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.58 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CL and MDLZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CL and MDLZ is 0.58 over 3 years, 0.53 over 1 year and 0.63 over 5 years.

Is MDLZ a good diversifier for CL?

To a limited degree. At 0.58 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.58 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cl-vs-mdlz.json

CL vs MDLZ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.58CL vs MDLZ0.58

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CL vs MDLZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cl-vs-mdlz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cl-vs-mdlz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CL correlations · MDLZ correlations