PairBook
HomeCL › CL vs OMH

CL vs OMH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Ohmyhome Limited - Class A (OMH) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1950.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CL and OMH?

On 3 years of weekly data the CL/OMH correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.10 versus -0.26 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1950.7 %².

Among the 40 assets we track against CL, OMH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #39. The last year tells two different stories: CL led by 104.0 percentage points, +10.4% for CL against -93.6% for OMH. Risk is not evenly split, since OMH carries 26.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CL vs OMH: side by side

CL (Colgate-Palmolive)OMH (Ohmyhome Limited - Class A)
1-year return+10.4%-93.6%
5-year return+32.0%n/a
Volatility (ann.)16.9%448.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.17-3.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.0%-97.9%
Market cap$72.5B
P/E (trailing)36.2
Dividend yield2.27%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: CL 2.27% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CL -29.0% vs -97.9%
-93%0%+65%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CL · OMH

Year-by-year returns

YearCLOMH
2022-5.4%
2023+3.8%
2024+16.6%-73.9%
2025-11.0%+102.0%
2026+17.2%-90.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CL and OMH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CL and OMH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with -0.10 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is OMH a good diversifier for CL?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cl-vs-omh.json

CL vs OMH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26CL vs OMH-0.26

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CL vs OMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cl-vs-omh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cl-vs-omh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CL correlations · OMH correlations