MCS vs SMBK: Correlation
Marcus Corporation (The) (MCS) and SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.41.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MCS and SMBK?
On 3 years of weekly data the MCS/SMBK correlation comes out at 0.41, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.48) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.40, and annualized covariance runs at 427.6 %².
By 3-year correlation, SMBK places #5 of the 12 assets tracked against MCS. The last year tells two different stories: MCS led by 53.9 percentage points, +91.5% for MCS against +37.6% for SMBK.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MCS vs SMBK: side by side
| MCS (Marcus Corporation (The)) | SMBK (SmartFinancial, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +91.5% | +37.6% |
| 5-year return | +106.8% | +113.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.9% | 28.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.53 | 0.84 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -42.9% | -26.4% |
| Market cap | $0.9B | $0.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 40.2 | 14.9 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.65% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MCS | SMBK |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -18.9% | +1.6% |
| 2023 | +2.9% | -9.7% |
| 2024 | +50.4% | +28.1% |
| 2025 | -26.6% | +20.5% |
| 2026 | +91.6% | +37.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MCS and SMBK good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.41, MCS and SMBK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MCS and SMBK?
The MCS/SMBK correlation stands at 0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.48, 5 years: 0.40), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is SMBK a good diversifier for MCS?
Reasonably. At 0.41, MCS and SMBK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.41 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcs-vs-smbk.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcs-vs-smbk/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MCS correlations · SMBK correlations
