CBNK vs MCS: Correlation
How closely do Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) and Marcus Corporation (The) (MCS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CBNK and MCS?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CBNK and MCS correlate at 0.43, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.40 over 1 year against 0.43 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.43, with an annualized covariance of 420.3 %².
Among the 18 assets we track against CBNK, MCS ranks #11 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MCS led by 84.2 percentage points, +7.3% for CBNK against +91.5% for MCS.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CBNK vs MCS: side by side
| CBNK (Capital Bancorp, Inc.) | MCS (Marcus Corporation (The)) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +7.3% | +91.5% |
| 5-year return | +69.0% | +106.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.3% | 35.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.63 | 0.53 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -24.8% | -42.9% |
| Market cap | $0.6B | $0.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.7 | 40.2 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 1.08% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CBNK | MCS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -9.3% | -18.9% |
| 2023 | +4.3% | +2.9% |
| 2024 | +19.7% | +50.4% |
| 2025 | +0.3% | -26.6% |
| 2026 | +30.5% | +91.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CBNK and MCS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CBNK and MCS?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.43 over 3 years, with 0.40 over the last year and 0.43 over 5 years.
Is MCS a good diversifier for CBNK?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cbnk-vs-mcs.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cbnk-vs-mcs/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CBNK correlations · MCS correlations
