CELC vs MCS: Correlation
Celcuity Inc. (CELC) and Marcus Corporation (The) (MCS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CELC and MCS?
On 3 years of weekly data the CELC/MCS correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.01 versus -0.19 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -868.6 %².
Within CELC's tracked universe of 38 assets, MCS comes in at #17 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: +86.6% for CELC against +91.5% for MCS. Risk is not evenly split, since CELC carries 3.5 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CELC vs MCS: side by side
| CELC (Celcuity Inc.) | MCS (Marcus Corporation (The)) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +86.6% | +91.5% |
| 5-year return | +324.8% | +106.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 124.5% | 35.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.76 | 0.53 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -62.0% | -42.9% |
| Market cap | $4.6B | $0.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 40.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CELC | MCS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +6.2% | -18.9% |
| 2023 | +4.0% | +2.9% |
| 2024 | -10.2% | +50.4% |
| 2025 | +662.0% | -26.6% |
| 2026 | -6.5% | +91.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CELC and MCS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CELC and MCS?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.01 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.
Is MCS a good diversifier for CELC?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/celc-vs-mcs.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/celc-vs-mcs/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CELC correlations · MCS correlations
