PairBook
HomeMCD › MCD vs XLY

MCD vs XLY: Correlation

McDonald's (MCD) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.29.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.29
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
103.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCD and XLY?

On 3 years of weekly data the MCD/XLY correlation comes out at 0.29, weak. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.32 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.43, and annualized covariance runs at 103.2 %².

Within MCD's tracked universe of 34 assets, XLY comes in at #21 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance XLY holds a 14.4-point edge, -14.5% against -0.1%. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.18 and 0.48, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCD vs XLY: side by side

MCD (McDonald's)XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-14.5%-0.1%
5-year return+23.3%+31.8%
Volatility (ann.)17.8%19.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.301.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.8%-26.0%
Market cap$184.0B
P/E (trailing)21.7
Dividend yield2.75%0.78%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$22.5B
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionarySector ETF
Higher yield: MCD 2.75% vs 0.78%Smaller drawdown: MCD -22.8% vs -26.0%Higher 5y return: XLY +31.8% vs +23.3%

XLY is a Consumer Cyclical fund from State Street Investment Management: $22.5B under management, 47 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 0.78% trailing dividend yield.

-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MCD · XLY

Year-by-year returns

YearMCDXLY
2022+0.5%-36.3%
2023+15.1%+39.6%
2024+0.1%+26.5%
2025+7.9%+7.4%
2026-13.9%-2.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

MCD represents 4.11% of XLY's portfolio, so part of any move in XLY is MCD itself, and the correlation between them is partly mechanical.

Are MCD and XLY good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.29 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCD and XLY?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MCD and XLY is 0.29 over 3 years, 0.32 over 1 year and 0.43 over 5 years.

Is XLY a good diversifier for MCD?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.29 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.29 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcd-vs-xly.json

MCD vs XLY: 3-year weekly correlation 0.29MCD vs XLY0.29

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MCD vs XLY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcd-vs-xly.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcd-vs-xly/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCD correlations · XLY correlations