PairBook
HomeMCD › MCD vs NRT

MCD vs NRT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, McDonald's (MCD) and North European Oil Royality Trust (NRT) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-230.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCD and NRT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MCD and NRT correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.06, with an annualized covariance of -230.6 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against MCD, NRT sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #32. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NRT outperformed by 99.7 percentage points (-14.5% for MCD against +85.2% for NRT). Note the risk asymmetry: NRT runs 2.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCD vs NRT: side by side

MCD (McDonald's)NRT (North European Oil Royality Trust)
1-year return-14.5%+85.2%
5-year return+23.3%+131.5%
Volatility (ann.)17.8%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.30-0.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.8%-66.1%
Market cap$184.0B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)21.78.4
Dividend yield2.75%11.95%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Lower P/E: NRT 8.4 vs 21.7Higher yield: NRT 11.95% vs 2.75%Smaller drawdown: MCD -22.8% vs -66.1%Higher 5y return: NRT +131.5% vs +23.3%
-16%0%+107%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MCD · NRT

Year-by-year returns

YearMCDNRT
2022+0.5%+41.9%
2023+15.1%-46.5%
2024+0.1%-25.3%
2025+7.9%+88.4%
2026-13.9%+41.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCD and NRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCD and NRT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.24 over the last year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is NRT a good diversifier for MCD?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcd-vs-nrt.json

MCD vs NRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25MCD vs NRT-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MCD vs NRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcd-vs-nrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcd-vs-nrt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCD correlations · NRT correlations