PairBook
HomeMCD › MCD vs XLP

MCD vs XLP: Correlation

McDonald's (MCD) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.52.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.52
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.63
long-run
Ann. covariance
103.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCD and XLP?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MCD and XLP correlate at 0.52, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.51 over 1 year against 0.52 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.63, with an annualized covariance of 103.7 %².

In MCD's tracked universe of 34 assets, XLP sits right near the top at #2. The last year tells two different stories: XLP led by 22.8 percentage points, -14.5% for MCD against +8.3% for XLP. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.46 and 0.77, a moderate band. Note the risk asymmetry: MCD runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCD vs XLP: side by side

MCD (McDonald's)XLP (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-14.5%+8.3%
5-year return+23.3%+34.7%
Volatility (ann.)17.8%11.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.300.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.8%-9.7%
Market cap$184.0B
P/E (trailing)21.7
Dividend yield2.75%2.58%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$14.6B
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionarySector ETF
Higher yield: MCD 2.75% vs 2.58%Smaller drawdown: XLP -9.7% vs -22.8%Higher 5y return: XLP +34.7% vs +23.3%

On the fund side, XLP sits in the Consumer Defensive category at State Street Investment Management, with $14.6B under management, 35 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 2.58% trailing dividend yield.

-16%0%+13%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MCD · XLP

Year-by-year returns

YearMCDXLP
2022+0.5%-0.8%
2023+15.1%-0.8%
2024+0.1%+12.2%
2025+7.9%+1.5%
2026-13.9%+10.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCD and XLP good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.52 means MCD and XLP share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCD and XLP?

The MCD/XLP correlation stands at 0.52 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.51, 5 years: 0.63), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLP a good diversifier for MCD?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.52 means MCD and XLP share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.52 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.52 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcd-vs-xlp.json

MCD vs XLP: 3-year weekly correlation 0.52MCD vs XLP0.52

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MCD vs XLP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcd-vs-xlp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcd-vs-xlp/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCD correlations · XLP correlations