PairBook
HomeMCD › MCD vs OMH

MCD vs OMH: Correlation

McDonald's (MCD) and Ohmyhome Limited - Class A (OMH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1967.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCD and OMH?

Over the past 3 years, MCD and OMH moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.12) than the 3-year average (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1967.3 %².

Out of 34 assets tracked against MCD, OMH lands near the bottom at #33. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MCD ahead by 79.1 points (-14.5% versus -93.6%). One caveat on sizing: OMH is 25.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCD vs OMH: side by side

MCD (McDonald's)OMH (Ohmyhome Limited - Class A)
1-year return-14.5%-93.6%
5-year return+23.3%n/a
Volatility (ann.)17.8%448.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.30-3.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.8%-97.9%
Market cap$184.0B
P/E (trailing)21.7
Dividend yield2.75%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: MCD 2.75% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCD -22.8% vs -97.9%
-93%0%+65%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MCD · OMH

Year-by-year returns

YearMCDOMH
2022+0.5%
2023+15.1%
2024+0.1%-73.9%
2025+7.9%+102.0%
2026-13.9%-90.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCD and OMH good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCD and OMH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.12 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is OMH a good diversifier for MCD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcd-vs-omh.json

MCD vs OMH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25MCD vs OMH-0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MCD vs OMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcd-vs-omh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcd-vs-omh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCD correlations · OMH correlations