MCD vs REG: Correlation
McDonald's (MCD) and Regency Centers (REG) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.42.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MCD and REG?
Over the past 3 years, MCD and REG moved with a correlation of 0.42, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.35 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.50, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 133.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, REG places #13 of the 34 assets tracked against MCD. The last year tells two different stories: REG led by 22.9 percentage points, -14.5% for MCD against +8.4% for REG. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.23 to 0.61.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MCD vs REG: side by side
| MCD (McDonald's) | REG (Regency Centers) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -14.5% | +8.4% |
| 5-year return | +23.3% | +35.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 17.8% | 17.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.30 | 0.34 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -22.8% | -15.1% |
| Market cap | $184.0B | $14.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 21.7 | 25.5 |
| Dividend yield | 2.75% | 3.89% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MCD | REG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +0.5% | -13.6% |
| 2023 | +15.1% | +11.9% |
| 2024 | +0.1% | +14.9% |
| 2025 | +7.9% | -2.8% |
| 2026 | -13.9% | +11.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MCD and REG good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.42, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MCD and REG?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MCD and REG is 0.42 over 3 years, 0.35 over 1 year and 0.50 over 5 years.
Is REG a good diversifier for MCD?
A fair diversifier. At 0.42, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.42 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.42 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcd-vs-reg.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcd-vs-reg/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MCD correlations · REG correlations
