PairBook
HomeMCD › MCD vs MITQ

MCD vs MITQ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, McDonald's (MCD) and Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (MITQ) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-414.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCD and MITQ?

On 3 years of weekly data the MCD/MITQ correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.21) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -414.6 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against MCD, MITQ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #34. The trailing year gives MCD the advantage: -14.5% versus -22.6%, a 8.1-point spread. Risk is not evenly split, since MITQ carries 4.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCD vs MITQ: side by side

MCD (McDonald's)MITQ (Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.)
1-year return-14.5%-22.6%
5-year return+23.3%-82.9%
Volatility (ann.)17.8%84.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.30-0.11
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.8%-66.4%
Market cap$184.0B
P/E (trailing)21.7
Dividend yield2.75%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: MCD 2.75% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCD -22.8% vs -66.4%Higher 5y return: MCD +23.3% vs -82.9%
-32%0%+80%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MCD · MITQ

Year-by-year returns

YearMCDMITQ
2022+0.5%-45.2%
2023+15.1%-17.8%
2024+0.1%-31.2%
2025+7.9%+1.7%
2026-13.9%-12.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCD and MITQ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCD and MITQ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MCD and MITQ is -0.28 over 3 years, -0.21 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is MITQ a good diversifier for MCD?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcd-vs-mitq.json

MCD vs MITQ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28MCD vs MITQ-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MCD vs MITQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcd-vs-mitq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcd-vs-mitq/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCD correlations · MITQ correlations