MBAI vs VTR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Check-Cap Ltd. (MBAI) and Ventas (VTR) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MBAI and VTR?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MBAI and VTR correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.36) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.21). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.12, with an annualized covariance of -2148.7 %².
Among the 26 assets we track against MBAI, VTR ranks #19 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MBAI outperformed by 870.4 percentage points (+910.8% for MBAI against +40.4% for VTR). One caveat on sizing: MBAI is 22.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MBAI vs VTR: side by side
| MBAI (Check-Cap Ltd.) | VTR (Ventas) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +910.8% | +40.4% |
| 5-year return | -69.3% | +98.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 474.4% | 21.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.76 | 0.25 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -87.3% | -16.7% |
| Market cap | – | $47.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 1.4 | 168.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MBAI | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -83.7% | -8.5% |
| 2023 | -5.5% | +15.1% |
| 2024 | -52.4% | +22.2% |
| 2025 | +63.6% | +35.1% |
| 2026 | +305.6% | +21.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MBAI and VTR good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MBAI and VTR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.36 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.
Is VTR a good diversifier for MBAI?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?
A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mbai-vs-vtr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mbai-vs-vtr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MBAI correlations · VTR correlations
