PairBook
HomeLII › LII vs MBAI

LII vs MBAI: Correlation

How closely do Lennox International (LII) and Check-Cap Ltd. (MBAI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.24
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5342.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LII and MBAI?

Over the past 3 years, LII and MBAI moved with a correlation of -0.35, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.51) than the 3-year average (-0.35). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.24, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -5342.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, MBAI places #27 of the 37 assets tracked against LII. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MBAI ahead by 941.1 points (-30.3% versus +910.8%). One caveat on sizing: MBAI is 14.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LII vs MBAI: side by side

LII (Lennox International)MBAI (Check-Cap Ltd.)
1-year return-30.3%+910.8%
5-year return+23.7%-69.3%
Volatility (ann.)32.0%474.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.961.76
Max drawdown (3Y)-41.7%-87.3%
Market cap$13.5B
P/E (trailing)17.51.4
Dividend yield1.34%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: MBAI 1.4 vs 17.5Higher yield: LII 1.34% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LII -41.7% vs -87.3%Higher 5y return: LII +23.7% vs -69.3%
-32%0%+1202%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LII · MBAI

Year-by-year returns

YearLIIMBAI
2022-24.9%-83.7%
2023+89.5%-5.5%
2024+37.3%-52.4%
2025-19.5%+63.6%
2026-19.0%+305.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LII and MBAI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.35 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LII and MBAI?

The LII/MBAI correlation stands at -0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.51, 5 years: -0.24), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MBAI a good diversifier for LII?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.35 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

A reading of -0.35 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lii-vs-mbai.json

LII vs MBAI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35LII vs MBAI-0.35

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LII vs MBAI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lii-vs-mbai.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lii-vs-mbai/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LII correlations · MBAI correlations