PairBook
HomeMACI › MACI vs XYL

MACI vs XYL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) and Xylem Inc. (XYL) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-8.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MACI and XYL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MACI and XYL correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.04) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.17). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -8.7 %².

Among the 71 assets we track against MACI, XYL ranks #20 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MACI outperformed by 25.5 percentage points (+4.4% for MACI against -21.1% for XYL). One caveat on sizing: XYL is 11.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MACI vs XYL: side by side

MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A)XYL (Xylem Inc.)
1-year return+4.4%-21.1%
5-year returnn/a-12.5%
Volatility (ann.)2.1%23.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.030.96
Max drawdown (3Y)-2.0%-30.0%
Market cap$0.2B$26.3B
P/E (trailing)60.926.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.47%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Lower P/E: XYL 26.8 vs 60.9Higher yield: XYL 1.47% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MACI -2.0% vs -30.0%
-23%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MACI · XYL

Year-by-year returns

YearMACIXYL
2022-6.6%
2023+4.8%
2024+2.6%
2025+5.7%+18.8%
2026+3.1%-16.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MACI and XYL good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MACI and XYL?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.17 over 3 years, with 0.04 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is XYL a good diversifier for MACI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/maci-vs-xyl.json

MACI vs XYL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17MACI vs XYL-0.17

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MACI vs XYL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/maci-vs-xyl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/maci-vs-xyl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MACI correlations · XYL correlations