PairBook
HomeMACI › MACI vs TRSG

MACI vs TRSG: Correlation

Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) and Tungray Technologies Inc - Class A (TRSG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.40.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.40
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-64.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MACI and TRSG?

On 3 years of weekly data the MACI/TRSG correlation comes out at -0.40, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.10 versus -0.40 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -64.7 %².

Among the 71 assets we track against MACI, TRSG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #71. The trailing year gives MACI the advantage: +4.4% versus -7.8%, a 12.2-point spread. Risk is not evenly split, since TRSG carries 44.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MACI vs TRSG: side by side

MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A)TRSG (Tungray Technologies Inc - Class A)
1-year return+4.4%-7.8%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)2.1%92.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.030.67
Max drawdown (3Y)-2.0%-86.3%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)60.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MACI -2.0% vs -86.3%
-36%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MACI · TRSG

Are MACI and TRSG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MACI and TRSG?

The MACI/TRSG correlation stands at -0.40 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.10, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TRSG a good diversifier for MACI?

Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.40 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.40 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/maci-vs-trsg.json

MACI vs TRSG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.40MACI vs TRSG-0.40

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MACI vs TRSG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/maci-vs-trsg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/maci-vs-trsg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MACI correlations · TRSG correlations