PairBook
HomeMACI › MACI vs TWG

MACI vs TWG: Correlation

Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) and Top Wealth Group Holding Limited - Class A (TWG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.14
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-175.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MACI and TWG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MACI and TWG correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.14 versus -0.33 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -175.9 %².

TWG is close to the least connected end of MACI's tracked universe, ranking #70 of 71. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MACI ahead by 94.0 points (+4.4% versus -89.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since TWG carries 118.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MACI vs TWG: side by side

MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A)TWG (Top Wealth Group Holding Limited - Class A)
1-year return+4.4%-89.6%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)2.1%248.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.030.99
Max drawdown (3Y)-2.0%-100.0%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)60.94.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: TWG 4.2 vs 60.9Smaller drawdown: MACI -2.0% vs -100.0%
-89%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MACI · TWG

Are MACI and TWG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MACI and TWG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.33 over 3 years, with -0.14 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is TWG a good diversifier for MACI?

Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/maci-vs-twg.json

MACI vs TWG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33MACI vs TWG-0.33

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MACI vs TWG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/maci-vs-twg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/maci-vs-twg/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MACI correlations · TWG correlations