MACI vs VT: Correlation
Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MACI and VT?
Over the past 3 years, MACI and VT moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.32) than the 3-year average (-0.19). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -5.6 %².
Within MACI's tracked universe of 71 assets, VT comes in at #33 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VT ahead by 18.3 points (+4.4% versus +22.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: VT runs 6.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MACI vs VT: side by side
| MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +4.4% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 2.1% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.03 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -2.0% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $0.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 60.9 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MACI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -18.0% |
| 2023 | – | +22.0% |
| 2024 | – | +16.5% |
| 2025 | +5.7% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | +3.1% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MACI and VT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, MACI and VT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MACI and VT?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MACI and VT is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is VT a good diversifier for MACI?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, MACI and VT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/maci-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/maci-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MACI correlations · VT correlations
