PairBook
HomeMACI › MACI vs QQQM

MACI vs QQQM: Correlation

Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) and Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-8.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MACI and QQQM?

On 3 years of weekly data the MACI/QQQM correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.20). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -8.7 %².

Among the 71 assets we track against MACI, QQQM ranks #37 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: QQQM led by 22.0 percentage points, +4.4% for MACI against +26.4% for QQQM. Risk is not evenly split, since QQQM carries 9.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MACI vs QQQM: side by side

MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A)QQQM (Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF)
1-year return+4.4%+26.4%
5-year returnn/a+96.1%
Volatility (ann.)2.1%19.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.031.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-2.0%-22.7%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)60.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.46%
Expense ratio0.15%
Assets under management$97.1B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: QQQM 0.46% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MACI -2.0% vs -22.7%

QQQM is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $97.1B under management, 105 holdings, a 0.15% expense ratio, a 0.46% trailing dividend yield.

-2%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MACI · QQQM

Year-by-year returns

YearMACIQQQM
2022-32.5%
2023+55.0%
2024+25.7%
2025+5.7%+20.9%
2026+3.1%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MACI and QQQM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MACI and QQQM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MACI and QQQM is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is QQQM a good diversifier for MACI?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/maci-vs-qqqm.json

MACI vs QQQM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20MACI vs QQQM-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MACI vs QQQM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/maci-vs-qqqm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/maci-vs-qqqm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MACI correlations · QQQM correlations