PairBook
HomeMACI › MACI vs MTA

MACI vs MTA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-29.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MACI and MTA?

Over the past 3 years, MACI and MTA moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.26) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -29.4 %².

MTA is close to the least connected end of MACI's tracked universe, ranking #67 of 71. The last year tells two different stories: MTA led by 115.3 percentage points, +4.4% for MACI against +119.7% for MTA. One caveat on sizing: MTA is 24.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MACI vs MTA: side by side

MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A)MTA (Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.)
1-year return+4.4%+119.7%
5-year returnn/a+45.5%
Volatility (ann.)2.1%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.031.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-2.0%-44.4%
Market cap$0.2B$1.0B
P/E (trailing)60.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MACI -2.0% vs -44.4%
0%0%+99%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MACI · MTA

Year-by-year returns

YearMACIMTA
2022-29.1%
2023-37.0%
2024-18.5%
2025+5.7%+210.0%
2026+3.1%+41.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MACI and MTA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, MACI and MTA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MACI and MTA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MACI and MTA is -0.27 over 3 years, -0.26 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MTA a good diversifier for MACI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, MACI and MTA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/maci-vs-mta.json

MACI vs MTA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27MACI vs MTA-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MACI vs MTA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/maci-vs-mta.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/maci-vs-mta/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MACI correlations · MTA correlations