LRN vs PAM: Correlation
How closely do Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.28, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LRN and PAM?
Over the past 3 years, LRN and PAM moved with a correlation of -0.28, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.66) than the 3-year average (-0.28). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -686.7 %².
Out of 16 assets tracked against LRN, PAM lands near the bottom at #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PAM ahead by 72.2 points (-49.8% versus +22.4%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LRN vs PAM: side by side
| LRN (Stride, Inc.) | PAM (Pampa Energia S.A.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -49.8% | +22.4% |
| 5-year return | +147.2% | +339.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.4% | 45.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -64.1% | -40.4% |
| Market cap | $3.5B | $4.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | 11.8 | 7.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LRN | PAM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.2% | +51.3% |
| 2023 | +89.8% | +55.0% |
| 2024 | +75.1% | +77.6% |
| 2025 | -37.5% | +0.6% |
| 2026 | +31.4% | -8.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LRN and PAM good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LRN and PAM?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LRN and PAM is -0.28 over 3 years, -0.66 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.
Is PAM a good diversifier for LRN?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?
A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lrn-vs-pam.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lrn-vs-pam/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LRN correlations · PAM correlations
