PairBook
HomeLQD › LQD vs SU

LQD vs SU: Correlation

iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-44.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LQD and SU?

Over the past 3 years, LQD and SU moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.49) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.21). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -44.2 %².

Within LQD's tracked universe of 33 assets, SU comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SU outperformed by 62.8 percentage points (+1.5% for LQD against +64.3% for SU). Note the risk asymmetry: SU runs 4.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LQD vs SU: side by side

LQD (iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF)SU (Suncor Energy Inc.)
1-year return+1.5%+64.3%
5-year return-4.1%+325.4%
Volatility (ann.)7.3%29.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.150.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-6.7%-22.7%
Market cap$78.4B
P/E (trailing)12.1
Dividend yield4.66%3.61%
Expense ratio0.14%
Assets under management$33.0B
Sector / categoryETF · BondsUS Listed
Higher yield: LQD 4.66% vs 3.61%Smaller drawdown: LQD -6.7% vs -22.7%Higher 5y return: SU +325.4% vs -4.1%

LQD is a Corporate Bond fund from iShares: $33.0B under management, a 0.14% expense ratio, a 4.66% trailing dividend yield.

-4%0%+74%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LQD · SU

Year-by-year returns

YearLQDSU
2022-17.9%+32.3%
2023+9.4%+6.0%
2024+0.9%+16.2%
2025+7.9%+27.1%
2026-0.5%+51.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LQD and SU good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, LQD and SU have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LQD and SU?

The LQD/SU correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.49, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SU a good diversifier for LQD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, LQD and SU have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lqd-vs-su.json

LQD vs SU: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21LQD vs SU-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LQD vs SU correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lqd-vs-su.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lqd-vs-su/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LQD correlations · SU correlations