PairBook
HomeBKT › BKT vs LQD

BKT vs LQD: Correlation

BlackRock Income Trust Inc. (The) (BKT) and iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.75.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.75
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.69
long-run
Ann. covariance
52.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BKT and LQD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BKT and LQD correlate at 0.75, strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.62) runs below the 3-year figure (0.75). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.69, with an annualized covariance of 52.9 %².

Few assets follow BKT as closely as LQD, which ranks #3 of 16 tracked partners. Their 12-month results are close: -3.3% for BKT against +1.5% for LQD.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BKT vs LQD: side by side

BKT (BlackRock Income Trust Inc. (The))LQD (iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF)
1-year return-3.3%+1.5%
5-year return-16.5%-4.1%
Volatility (ann.)9.7%7.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.190.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-10.4%-6.7%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)11.0
Dividend yield10.17%4.66%
Expense ratio0.14%
Assets under management$33.0B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Bonds
Higher yield: BKT 10.17% vs 4.66%Smaller drawdown: LQD -6.7% vs -10.4%Higher 5y return: LQD -4.1% vs -16.5%

LQD, iShares's Corporate Bond fund, carries $33.0B under management, a 0.14% expense ratio, a 4.66% trailing dividend yield.

-6%0%+2%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BKT · LQD

Year-by-year returns

YearBKTLQD
2022-21.6%-17.9%
2023+7.6%+9.4%
2024+3.2%+0.9%
2025+5.0%+7.9%
2026+0.0%-0.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BKT and LQD good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.75 means BKT and LQD share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BKT and LQD?

The BKT/LQD correlation stands at 0.75 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.62, 5 years: 0.69), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LQD a good diversifier for BKT?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.75 means BKT and LQD share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.75 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.75 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bkt-vs-lqd.json

BKT vs LQD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.75BKT vs LQD0.75

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BKT vs LQD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bkt-vs-lqd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bkt-vs-lqd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BKT correlations · LQD correlations