PairBook
HomeAGG › AGG vs LQD

AGG vs LQD: Correlation

How closely do iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.97, which is very strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.97
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.95
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.95
long-run
Ann. covariance
37.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AGG and LQD?

On 3 years of weekly data the AGG/LQD correlation comes out at 0.97, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.95 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.95, and annualized covariance runs at 37.2 %².

Few assets follow AGG as closely as LQD, which ranks #3 of 34 tracked partners. Their 12-month results are close: +2.3% for AGG against +1.5% for LQD. Stability stands out here, with the rolling one-year correlation confined to 0.93 through 0.98.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AGG vs LQD: side by side

AGG (iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF)LQD (iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF)
1-year return+2.3%+1.5%
5-year return-1.1%-4.1%
Volatility (ann.)5.3%7.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.070.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-4.8%-6.7%
Dividend yield4.05%4.66%
Expense ratio0.03%0.14%
Assets under management$137.1B$33.0B
Sector / categoryETF · BondsETF · Bonds
Lower fee: AGG 0.03% vs 0.14%Higher yield: LQD 4.66% vs 4.05%Smaller drawdown: AGG -4.8% vs -6.7%Higher 5y return: AGG -1.1% vs -4.1%

AGG, iShares's Intermediate Core Bond fund, carries $137.1B under management, a 0.03% expense ratio, a 4.05% trailing dividend yield. LQD, iShares's Corporate Bond fund, carries $33.0B under management, a 0.14% expense ratio, a 4.66% trailing dividend yield.

-1%0%+3%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. AGG · LQD

Year-by-year returns

YearAGGLQD
2022-13.0%-17.9%
2023+5.7%+9.4%
2024+1.3%+0.9%
2025+7.2%+7.9%
2026+0.3%-0.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AGG and LQD good diversifiers for each other?

No. With a correlation of 0.97, AGG and LQD move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AGG and LQD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.97 over 3 years, with 0.95 over the last year and 0.95 over 5 years.

Is LQD a good diversifier for AGG?

No. With a correlation of 0.97, AGG and LQD move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

What does a correlation of 0.97 mean?

A reading of 0.97 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/agg-vs-lqd.json

AGG vs LQD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.97AGG vs LQD0.97

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AGG vs LQD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/agg-vs-lqd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/agg-vs-lqd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AGG correlations · LQD correlations