IBB vs QQQM: Correlation & Overlap
iShares Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.47. The two funds also share 3.0% of their portfolios by weight.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are IBB and QQQM?
Over the past 3 years, IBB and QQQM moved with a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.28) than the 3-year average (0.47). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.56, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 188.9 %².
Within IBB's tracked universe of 168 assets, QQQM comes in at #116 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IBB outperformed by 29.0 percentage points (+55.4% for IBB against +26.4% for QQQM). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.27 and 0.73 over the past three years, a moderate range.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
IBB vs QQQM: side by side
| IBB (iShares Biotechnology ETF) | QQQM (Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +55.4% | +26.4% |
| 5-year return | +26.6% | +96.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 20.7% | 19.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.81 | 1.28 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -24.9% | -22.7% |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 0.46% |
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.15% |
| Assets under management | $9.2B | $97.1B |
| Sector / category | ETF · Thematic | ETF · US Growth & Tech |
IBB is a Health fund from iShares: $9.2B under management, 235 holdings, a 0.44% expense ratio, a 0.22% trailing dividend yield. QQQM is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $97.1B under management, 105 holdings, a 0.15% expense ratio, a 0.46% trailing dividend yield.
Portfolio overlap between IBB and QQQM
The two portfolios are largely distinct: 3.0% of the funds' weight sits in the same underlying holdings (5 common positions). Correlation tells you they move together; overlap tells you why.
| Common holding | Weight in IBB | Weight in QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| AMGN | 8.43% | 1.06% |
| GILD | 7.10% | 0.81% |
| VRTX | 7.89% | 0.62% |
| REGN | 5.68% | 0.37% |
| ALNY | 2.19% | 0.14% |
Largest positions held only by IBB: MRNA (3.76%), ARGX (3.76%), NTRA (3.19%), RVMD (2.83%), ILMN (2.34%). Only by QQQM: NVDA (8.15%), AAPL (7.39%), MSFT (5.93%), MU (4.69%), AMZN (4.50%).
Overlap = sum of the smaller of the two weights across common holdings, from issuer disclosures as of 2026-08-26. Top 5 common positions shown.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | IBB | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -13.7% | -32.5% |
| 2023 | +3.8% | +55.0% |
| 2024 | -2.4% | +25.7% |
| 2025 | +28.0% | +20.9% |
| 2026 | +27.4% | +17.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are IBB and QQQM good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between IBB and QQQM?
The IBB/QQQM correlation stands at 0.47 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.28, 5 years: 0.56), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is QQQM a good diversifier for IBB?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
How much do IBB and QQQM overlap?
The two funds share 5 holdings amounting to 3.0% of weight, per issuer portfolio files dated 2026-08-26.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ibb-vs-qqqm.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ibb-vs-qqqm/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: IBB correlations · QQQM correlations
