PairBook
HomeHQL › HQL vs MRNA

HQL vs MRNA: Correlation

How closely do abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest (HQL) and Moderna (MRNA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.41, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.41
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
967.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HQL and MRNA?

On 3 years of weekly data the HQL/MRNA correlation comes out at 0.41, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.36) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.45, and annualized covariance runs at 967.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, MRNA places #59 of the 72 assets tracked against HQL. The last year tells two different stories: MRNA led by 392.9 percentage points, +75.9% for HQL against +468.8% for MRNA. One caveat on sizing: MRNA is 4.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HQL vs MRNA: side by side

HQL (abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest)MRNA (Moderna)
1-year return+75.9%+468.8%
5-year return+74.1%-61.5%
Volatility (ann.)23.5%100.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.880.98
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.1%-86.6%
Market cap$57.0B
P/E (trailing)3.2
Dividend yield8.87%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: HQL 8.87% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HQL -25.1% vs -86.6%Higher 5y return: HQL +74.1% vs -61.5%
-6%0%+477%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HQL · MRNA

Year-by-year returns

YearHQLMRNA
2022-19.2%-29.3%
2023+4.2%-44.6%
2024+11.0%-58.2%
2025+45.5%-29.1%
2026+40.9%+384.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HQL and MRNA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HQL and MRNA?

The HQL/MRNA correlation stands at 0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.36, 5 years: 0.45), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MRNA a good diversifier for HQL?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.41 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hql-vs-mrna.json

HQL vs MRNA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.41HQL vs MRNA0.41

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HQL vs MRNA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hql-vs-mrna.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hql-vs-mrna/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HQL correlations · MRNA correlations