PairBook
HomeBMEZ › BMEZ vs HQL

BMEZ vs HQL: Correlation

How closely do BlackRock Health Sciences Term Trust (BMEZ) and abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest (HQL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.68, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.68
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.67
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.71
long-run
Ann. covariance
265.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMEZ and HQL?

On 3 years of weekly data the BMEZ/HQL correlation comes out at 0.68, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.67) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.71, and annualized covariance runs at 265.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, HQL places #5 of the 23 assets tracked against BMEZ. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HQL outperformed by 44.5 percentage points (+31.4% for BMEZ against +75.9% for HQL).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMEZ vs HQL: side by side

BMEZ (BlackRock Health Sciences Term Trust)HQL (abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest)
1-year return+31.4%+75.9%
5-year return+0.9%+74.1%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%23.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.88
Max drawdown (3Y)-18.3%-25.1%
Market cap$1.1B
P/E (trailing)6.73.2
Dividend yield0.00%8.87%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: HQL 3.2 vs 6.7Higher yield: HQL 8.87% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BMEZ -18.3% vs -25.1%Higher 5y return: HQL +74.1% vs +0.9%
-3%0%+72%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BMEZ · HQL

Year-by-year returns

YearBMEZHQL
2022-32.7%-19.2%
2023+5.1%+4.2%
2024+9.5%+11.0%
2025+18.7%+45.5%
2026+20.6%+40.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMEZ and HQL good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.68 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMEZ and HQL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BMEZ and HQL is 0.68 over 3 years, 0.67 over 1 year and 0.71 over 5 years.

Is HQL a good diversifier for BMEZ?

To a limited degree. At 0.68 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.68 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.68 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmez-vs-hql.json

BMEZ vs HQL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.68BMEZ vs HQL0.68

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BMEZ vs HQL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmez-vs-hql.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmez-vs-hql/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMEZ correlations · HQL correlations