PairBook
HomeBMEZ › BMEZ vs HQH

BMEZ vs HQH: Correlation

How closely do BlackRock Health Sciences Term Trust (BMEZ) and abrdn Healthcare Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest (HQH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.72, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.72
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.70
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.72
long-run
Ann. covariance
259.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMEZ and HQH?

On 3 years of weekly data the BMEZ/HQH correlation comes out at 0.72, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.70 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.72, and annualized covariance runs at 259.2 %².

HQH is one of the assets that tracks BMEZ most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 23 assets we track against BMEZ. The last year tells two different stories: HQH led by 28.4 percentage points, +31.4% for BMEZ against +59.8% for HQH.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMEZ vs HQH: side by side

BMEZ (BlackRock Health Sciences Term Trust)HQH (abrdn Healthcare Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest)
1-year return+31.4%+59.8%
5-year return+0.9%+51.1%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%21.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-18.3%-21.1%
Market cap$1.1B
P/E (trailing)6.75.2
Dividend yield0.00%9.62%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: HQH 5.2 vs 6.7Higher yield: HQH 9.62% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BMEZ -18.3% vs -21.1%Higher 5y return: HQH +51.1% vs +0.9%
-3%0%+58%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BMEZ · HQH

Year-by-year returns

YearBMEZHQH
2022-32.7%-17.3%
2023+5.1%+1.2%
2024+9.5%+10.2%
2025+18.7%+34.1%
2026+20.6%+33.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMEZ and HQH good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.72 means BMEZ and HQH share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMEZ and HQH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BMEZ and HQH is 0.72 over 3 years, 0.70 over 1 year and 0.72 over 5 years.

Is HQH a good diversifier for BMEZ?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.72 means BMEZ and HQH share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmez-vs-hqh.json

BMEZ vs HQH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.72BMEZ vs HQH0.72

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BMEZ vs HQH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmez-vs-hqh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmez-vs-hqh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMEZ correlations · HQH correlations