GLSI vs VT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) carry a correlation of 0.36, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GLSI and VT?
Over the past 3 years, GLSI and VT moved with a correlation of 0.36, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.35 over 1 year against 0.36 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.37, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 367.8 %².
Within GLSI's tracked universe of 10 assets, VT comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GLSI outperformed by 37.8 percentage points (+60.5% for GLSI against +22.7% for VT). One caveat on sizing: GLSI is 5.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GLSI vs VT: side by side
| GLSI (Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +60.5% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | -52.7% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 73.1% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.76 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -61.9% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GLSI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -37.5% | -18.0% |
| 2023 | -30.8% | +22.0% |
| 2024 | +6.7% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | +87.1% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | -10.9% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GLSI and VT good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.36, GLSI and VT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GLSI and VT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.36 over 3 years, with 0.35 over the last year and 0.37 over 5 years.
Is VT a good diversifier for GLSI?
Reasonably. At 0.36, GLSI and VT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/glsi-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/glsi-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GLSI correlations · VT correlations
