PairBook
HomeGJS › GJS vs INTZ

GJS vs INTZ: Correlation

How closely do Goldman Sachs Group Securities STRATS Trust for Goldman (GJS) and Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.15, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.15
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.15
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-310.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GJS and INTZ?

Over the past 3 years, GJS and INTZ moved with a correlation of -0.15, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.15 over 1 year against -0.15 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -310.8 %².

Within GJS's tracked universe of 15 assets, INTZ comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GJS ahead by 62.3 points (+6.3% versus -56.0%). Risk is not evenly split, since INTZ carries 39.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GJS vs INTZ: side by side

GJS (Goldman Sachs Group Securities STRATS Trust for Goldman)INTZ (Intrusion Inc.)
1-year return+6.3%-56.0%
5-year return+42.1%-99.1%
Volatility (ann.)7.2%281.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.032.38
Max drawdown (3Y)-3.9%-97.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJS -3.9% vs -97.9%Higher 5y return: GJS +42.1% vs -99.1%
-62%0%+17%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GJS · INTZ

Year-by-year returns

YearGJSINTZ
2022+0.8%-8.1%
2023+11.1%-92.1%
2024+10.2%-38.4%
2025+8.4%-62.7%
2026+3.8%-29.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GJS and INTZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.15 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GJS and INTZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.15 over 3 years, with -0.15 over the last year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is INTZ a good diversifier for GJS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.15 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gjs-vs-intz.json

GJS vs INTZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.15GJS vs INTZ-0.15

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GJS vs INTZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gjs-vs-intz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gjs-vs-intz/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GJS correlations · INTZ correlations