PairBook
HomeCRC › CRC vs GJS

CRC vs GJS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, California Resources Corporation (CRC) and Goldman Sachs Group Securities STRATS Trust for Goldman (GJS) carry a correlation of 0.29, a weak link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.29
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
73.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CRC and GJS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CRC and GJS correlate at 0.29, weak. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.34) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.18, with an annualized covariance of 73.6 %².

Within CRC's tracked universe of 13 assets, GJS comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +8.5% for CRC and +6.3% for GJS. Note the risk asymmetry: CRC runs 4.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CRC vs GJS: side by side

CRC (California Resources Corporation)GJS (Goldman Sachs Group Securities STRATS Trust for Goldman)
1-year return+8.5%+6.3%
5-year return+78.6%+42.1%
Volatility (ann.)34.5%7.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.590.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.8%-3.9%
Market cap$4.7B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield3.05%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJS -3.9% vs -44.8%Higher 5y return: CRC +78.6% vs +42.1%
-10%0%+43%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CRC · GJS

Year-by-year returns

YearCRCGJS
2022+3.7%+0.8%
2023+28.9%+11.1%
2024-2.6%+10.2%
2025-10.8%+8.4%
2026+20.0%+3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CRC and GJS good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.29, CRC and GJS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CRC and GJS?

The CRC/GJS correlation stands at 0.29 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.34, 5 years: 0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GJS a good diversifier for CRC?

Reasonably. At 0.29, CRC and GJS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.29 mean?

A reading of 0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/crc-vs-gjs.json

CRC vs GJS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.29CRC vs GJS0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CRC vs GJS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/crc-vs-gjs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/crc-vs-gjs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CRC correlations · GJS correlations