PairBook
HomeAIFF › AIFF vs GJS

AIFF vs GJS: Correlation

How closely do Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. (AIFF) and Goldman Sachs Group Securities STRATS Trust for Goldman (GJS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.28, which is weak.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.28
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
392.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AIFF and GJS?

Over the past 3 years, AIFF and GJS moved with a correlation of 0.28, which is weak. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.39) than the 3-year average (0.28). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.20, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 392.6 %².

Within AIFF's tracked universe of 15 assets, GJS comes in at #10 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GJS outperformed by 65.2 percentage points (-58.9% for AIFF against +6.3% for GJS). One caveat on sizing: AIFF is 26.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AIFF vs GJS: side by side

AIFF (Firefly Neuroscience, Inc.)GJS (Goldman Sachs Group Securities STRATS Trust for Goldman)
1-year return-58.9%+6.3%
5-year return-98.8%+42.1%
Volatility (ann.)190.4%7.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.780.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.9%-3.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJS -3.9% vs -95.9%Higher 5y return: GJS +42.1% vs -98.8%
-75%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AIFF · GJS

Year-by-year returns

YearAIFFGJS
2022-90.3%+0.8%
2023-64.8%+11.1%
2024-47.7%+10.2%
2025-66.8%+8.4%
2026+22.7%+3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AIFF and GJS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.28 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AIFF and GJS?

The AIFF/GJS correlation stands at 0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.39, 5 years: 0.20), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GJS a good diversifier for AIFF?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.28 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?

A reading of 0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aiff-vs-gjs.json

AIFF vs GJS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.28AIFF vs GJS0.28

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AIFF vs GJS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/aiff-vs-gjs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aiff-vs-gjs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AIFF correlations · GJS correlations