GIS vs VRT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, General Mills (GIS) and Vertiv (VRT) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GIS and VRT?
Over the past 3 years, GIS and VRT moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.25 over 1 year against -0.25 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.24, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -288.4 %².
By 3-year correlation, VRT places #32 of the 38 assets tracked against GIS. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VRT ahead by 121.3 points (-12.8% versus +108.5%). Stability stands out here, with the rolling one-year correlation confined to -0.36 through -0.15. Note the risk asymmetry: VRT runs 2.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GIS vs VRT: side by side
| GIS (General Mills) | VRT (Vertiv) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -12.8% | +108.5% |
| 5-year return | -14.6% | +847.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 20.6% | 57.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.05 | 2.36 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -53.4% | -61.3% |
| Market cap | $21.6B | $103.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 59.6 |
| Dividend yield | 6.09% | 0.07% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Staples | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GIS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +28.1% | -45.3% |
| 2023 | -20.0% | +251.8% |
| 2024 | +1.4% | +136.8% |
| 2025 | -23.7% | +42.8% |
| 2026 | -8.8% | +66.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GIS and VRT good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GIS and VRT?
The GIS/VRT correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.25, 5 years: -0.24), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VRT a good diversifier for GIS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gis-vs-vrt.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gis-vs-vrt/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GIS correlations · VRT correlations
