GIS vs OMH: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, General Mills (GIS) and Ohmyhome Limited - Class A (OMH) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GIS and OMH?
Over the past 3 years, GIS and OMH moved with a correlation of -0.28, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.31 over 1 year against -0.28 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2567.9 %².
Out of 38 assets tracked against GIS, OMH lands near the bottom at #34. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GIS outperformed by 80.8 percentage points (-12.8% for GIS against -93.6% for OMH). Risk is not evenly split, since OMH carries 21.8 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GIS vs OMH: side by side
| GIS (General Mills) | OMH (Ohmyhome Limited - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -12.8% | -93.6% |
| 5-year return | -14.6% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 20.6% | 448.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.05 | -3.85 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -53.4% | -97.9% |
| Market cap | $21.6B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 6.09% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Staples | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GIS | OMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +28.1% | – |
| 2023 | -20.0% | – |
| 2024 | +1.4% | -73.9% |
| 2025 | -23.7% | +102.0% |
| 2026 | -8.8% | -90.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GIS and OMH good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GIS and OMH?
The GIS/OMH correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.31, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is OMH a good diversifier for GIS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?
A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gis-vs-omh.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gis-vs-omh/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GIS correlations · OMH correlations
