GIS vs MRVL: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, General Mills (GIS) and Marvell Technology (MRVL) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GIS and MRVL?
Over the past 3 years, GIS and MRVL moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.27 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.19, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -297.2 %².
By 3-year correlation, MRVL places #31 of the 38 assets tracked against GIS. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MRVL outperformed by 236.3 percentage points (-12.8% for GIS against +223.5% for MRVL). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between -0.43 and -0.11, a moderate band. Risk is not evenly split, since MRVL carries 2.8 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GIS vs MRVL: side by side
| GIS (General Mills) | MRVL (Marvell Technology) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -12.8% | +223.5% |
| 5-year return | -14.6% | +297.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 20.6% | 57.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.05 | 2.19 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -53.4% | -60.8% |
| Market cap | $21.6B | $217.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 82.7 |
| Dividend yield | 6.09% | 0.10% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Staples | Information Technology |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GIS | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +28.1% | -57.5% |
| 2023 | -20.0% | +63.7% |
| 2024 | +1.4% | +83.8% |
| 2025 | -23.7% | -22.8% |
| 2026 | -8.8% | +184.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GIS and MRVL good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, GIS and MRVL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GIS and MRVL?
The GIS/MRVL correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.27, 5 years: -0.19), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MRVL a good diversifier for GIS?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, GIS and MRVL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gis-vs-mrvl.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gis-vs-mrvl/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GIS correlations · MRVL correlations
