PairBook
HomeFLNC › FLNC vs WM

FLNC vs WM: Correlation

Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Waste Management (WM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-494.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLNC and WM?

On 3 years of weekly data the FLNC/WM correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.41 versus -0.25 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.09, and annualized covariance runs at -494.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, WM places #14 of the 19 assets tracked against FLNC. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FLNC ahead by 59.0 points (+57.0% versus -2.0%). One caveat on sizing: FLNC is 6.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLNC vs WM: side by side

FLNC (Fluence Energy, Inc.)WM (Waste Management)
1-year return+57.0%-2.0%
5-year return-67.3%+51.8%
Volatility (ann.)109.2%18.3%
Beta vs S&P 5002.110.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.9%-18.1%
Market cap$2.1B$87.0B
P/E (trailing)30.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.60%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: WM 1.60% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WM -18.1% vs -86.9%Higher 5y return: WM +51.8% vs -67.3%
-9%0%+308%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FLNC · WM

Year-by-year returns

YearFLNCWM
2022-51.8%-4.5%
2023+39.1%+16.2%
2024-33.4%+14.3%
2025+24.6%+10.5%
2026-42.2%-0.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLNC and WM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, FLNC and WM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLNC and WM?

The FLNC/WM correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.41, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WM a good diversifier for FLNC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, FLNC and WM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flnc-vs-wm.json

FLNC vs WM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25FLNC vs WM-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FLNC vs WM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flnc-vs-wm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flnc-vs-wm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLNC correlations · WM correlations