PairBook
HomeEMBC › EMBC vs FLNC

EMBC vs FLNC: Correlation

Embecta Corp. (EMBC) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.64
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2064.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EMBC and FLNC?

Over the past 3 years, EMBC and FLNC moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.64) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.26). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.16, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2064.9 %².

FLNC is close to the least connected end of EMBC's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 15. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FLNC outperformed by 121.5 percentage points (-64.5% for EMBC against +57.0% for FLNC). Risk is not evenly split, since FLNC carries 1.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EMBC vs FLNC: side by side

EMBC (Embecta Corp.)FLNC (Fluence Energy, Inc.)
1-year return-64.5%+57.0%
5-year return-87.8%-67.3%
Volatility (ann.)72.4%109.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.912.11
Max drawdown (3Y)-85.3%-86.9%
Market cap$0.3B$2.1B
P/E (trailing)3.4
Dividend yield9.29%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: EMBC 9.29% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EMBC -85.3% vs -86.9%Higher 5y return: FLNC -67.3% vs -87.8%
-79%0%+308%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EMBC · FLNC

Year-by-year returns

YearEMBCFLNC
2022-51.8%
2023-23.1%+39.1%
2024+13.6%-33.4%
2025-39.6%+24.6%
2026-57.4%-42.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EMBC and FLNC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EMBC and FLNC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EMBC and FLNC is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.64 over 1 year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is FLNC a good diversifier for EMBC?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/embc-vs-flnc.json

EMBC vs FLNC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26EMBC vs FLNC-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EMBC vs FLNC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/embc-vs-flnc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/embc-vs-flnc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EMBC correlations · FLNC correlations