PairBook
HomeFLNC › FLNC vs PLMR

FLNC vs PLMR: Correlation

Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.29.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1120.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLNC and PLMR?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FLNC and PLMR correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.29 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.05, with an annualized covariance of -1120.2 %².

Out of 19 assets tracked against FLNC, PLMR lands near the bottom at #19. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FLNC outperformed by 52.0 percentage points (+57.0% for FLNC against +5.0% for PLMR). Risk is not evenly split, since FLNC carries 3.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLNC vs PLMR: side by side

FLNC (Fluence Energy, Inc.)PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+57.0%+5.0%
5-year return-67.3%+44.4%
Volatility (ann.)109.2%35.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.110.34
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.9%-42.3%
Market cap$2.1B$3.4B
P/E (trailing)17.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PLMR -42.3% vs -86.9%Higher 5y return: PLMR +44.4% vs -67.3%
-13%0%+308%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FLNC · PLMR

Year-by-year returns

YearFLNCPLMR
2022-51.8%-30.3%
2023+39.1%+22.9%
2024-33.4%+90.3%
2025+24.6%+27.6%
2026-42.2%-3.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLNC and PLMR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLNC and PLMR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.29 over 3 years, with -0.29 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is PLMR a good diversifier for FLNC?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flnc-vs-plmr.json

FLNC vs PLMR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29FLNC vs PLMR-0.29

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FLNC vs PLMR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flnc-vs-plmr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flnc-vs-plmr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLNC correlations · PLMR correlations