PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs XLE

FANG vs XLE: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) carry a correlation of 0.83, a very strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.83
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.86
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.88
long-run
Ann. covariance
653.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and XLE?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FANG and XLE correlate at 0.83, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.86) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.88, with an annualized covariance of 653.9 %².

Within FANG's tracked universe of 41 assets, XLE comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +39.6% against +44.0%. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.68 and 0.95, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs XLE: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+39.6%+44.0%
5-year return+224.9%+206.7%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%23.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.320.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-20.1%
Market cap$56.1B
P/E (trailing)38.0
Dividend yield2.13%2.55%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$39.2B
Sector / categoryEnergySector ETF
Higher yield: XLE 2.55% vs 2.13%Smaller drawdown: XLE -20.1% vs -42.1%Higher 5y return: FANG +224.9% vs +206.7%

XLE is an Equity Energy fund from State Street Investment Management: $39.2B under management, 22 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 2.55% trailing dividend yield.

-2%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FANG · XLE

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGXLE
2022+35.3%+64.3%
2023+19.7%-0.6%
2024+10.3%+5.6%
2025-5.6%+7.9%
2026+35.7%+41.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

Keep in mind that XLE holds FANG at a 2.3% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.

Are FANG and XLE good diversifiers for each other?

Not really. At 0.83, the two trade almost as one position, and owning both buys little extra protection.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and XLE?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.83 over 3 years, with 0.86 over the last year and 0.88 over 5 years.

Is XLE a good diversifier for FANG?

Not really. At 0.83, the two trade almost as one position, and owning both buys little extra protection.

What does a correlation of 0.83 mean?

A reading of 0.83 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-xle.json

FANG vs XLE: 3-year weekly correlation 0.83FANG vs XLE0.83

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FANG vs XLE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-xle.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-xle/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · XLE correlations