PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs PR

FANG vs PR: Correlation

How closely do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources Corporation (PR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.87, which is very strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.87
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.85
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.84
long-run
Ann. covariance
1046.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and PR?

On 3 years of weekly data the FANG/PR correlation comes out at 0.87, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.85 over 1 year against 0.87 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.84, and annualized covariance runs at 1046.8 %².

In FANG's tracked universe of 41 assets, PR sits right near the top at #1. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PR ahead by 30.7 points (+39.6% versus +70.3%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs PR: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)PR (Permian Resources Corporation)
1-year return+39.6%+70.3%
5-year return+224.9%+430.6%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%35.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.320.39
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-39.9%
Market cap$56.1B$19.4B
P/E (trailing)38.014.7
Dividend yield2.13%2.73%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Lower P/E: PR 14.7 vs 38.0Higher yield: PR 2.73% vs 2.13%Smaller drawdown: PR -39.9% vs -42.1%Higher 5y return: PR +430.6% vs +224.9%
-11%0%+78%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FANG · PR

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGPR
2022+35.3%+57.9%
2023+19.7%+49.4%
2024+10.3%+10.7%
2025-5.6%+1.9%
2026+35.7%+68.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FANG and PR good diversifiers for each other?

No: a correlation of 0.87 means FANG and PR tend to fall together, which is precisely when diversification is supposed to help.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and PR?

The FANG/PR correlation stands at 0.87 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.85, 5 years: 0.84), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PR a good diversifier for FANG?

No: a correlation of 0.87 means FANG and PR tend to fall together, which is precisely when diversification is supposed to help.

What does a correlation of 0.87 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-pr.json

FANG vs PR: 3-year weekly correlation 0.87FANG vs PR0.87

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FANG vs PR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-pr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-pr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · PR correlations