PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs SURG

FANG vs SURG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SurgePays, Inc. (SURG) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-900.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and SURG?

On 3 years of weekly data the FANG/SURG correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.45) than the 3-year average (-0.28). The 5-year figure is -0.07, and annualized covariance runs at -900.9 %².

Among the 41 assets we track against FANG, SURG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #41. The last year tells two different stories: FANG led by 132.7 percentage points, +39.6% for FANG against -93.1% for SURG. Note the risk asymmetry: SURG runs 2.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs SURG: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)SURG (SurgePays, Inc.)
1-year return+39.6%-93.1%
5-year return+224.9%-96.6%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%93.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.321.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-98.1%
Market cap$56.1B
P/E (trailing)38.0
Dividend yield2.13%0.00%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: FANG 2.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FANG -42.1% vs -98.1%Higher 5y return: FANG +224.9% vs -96.6%
-94%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FANG · SURG

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGSURG
2022+35.3%+224.8%
2023+19.7%-1.7%
2024+10.3%-72.4%
2025-5.6%-6.2%
2026+35.7%-89.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FANG and SURG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and SURG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FANG and SURG is -0.28 over 3 years, -0.45 over 1 year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is SURG a good diversifier for FANG?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-surg.json

FANG vs SURG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28FANG vs SURG-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FANG vs SURG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-surg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-surg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · SURG correlations