PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs SPY

FANG vs SPY: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) carry a correlation of 0.13, a weak link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.13
weak
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
66.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and SPY?

Over the past 3 years, FANG and SPY moved with a correlation of 0.13, which is weak. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.32 versus 0.13 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 66.5 %².

Within FANG's tracked universe of 41 assets, SPY comes in at #29 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FANG outperformed by 19.0 percentage points (+39.6% for FANG against +20.6% for SPY). Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from -0.32 to 0.46. Note the risk asymmetry: FANG runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs SPY: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust)
1-year return+39.6%+20.6%
5-year return+224.9%+82.4%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%14.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.321.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-18.8%
Market cap$56.1B
P/E (trailing)38.0
Dividend yield2.13%1.01%
Expense ratio0.09%
Assets under management$795.3B
Sector / categoryEnergyETF · US Large Cap
Higher yield: FANG 2.13% vs 1.01%Smaller drawdown: SPY -18.8% vs -42.1%Higher 5y return: FANG +224.9% vs +82.4%

SPY is a Large Blend fund from State Street Investment Management: $795.3B under management, 504 holdings, a 0.09% expense ratio, a 1.01% trailing dividend yield.

-1%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FANG · SPY

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGSPY
2022+35.3%-18.2%
2023+19.7%+26.2%
2024+10.3%+24.9%
2025-5.6%+17.7%
2026+35.7%+13.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

FANG represents 0.06% of SPY's portfolio, so part of any move in SPY is FANG itself, and the correlation between them is partly mechanical.

Are FANG and SPY good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of 0.13 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and SPY?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.13 over 3 years, with -0.32 over the last year and 0.27 over 5 years.

Is SPY a good diversifier for FANG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of 0.13 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of 0.13 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-spy.json

FANG vs SPY: 3-year weekly correlation 0.13FANG vs SPY0.13

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FANG vs SPY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-spy.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-spy/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · SPY correlations