PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs RKT

FANG vs RKT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-475.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and RKT?

Over the past 3 years, FANG and RKT moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.48) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.07, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -475.1 %².

Among the 41 assets we track against FANG, RKT ranks #35 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FANG ahead by 60.8 points (+39.6% versus -21.2%). Risk is not evenly split, since RKT carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs RKT: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)RKT (Rocket Companies, Inc.)
1-year return+39.6%-21.2%
5-year return+224.9%-7.5%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%55.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.321.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-50.6%
Market cap$56.1B$40.3B
P/E (trailing)38.0
Dividend yield2.13%0.00%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: FANG 2.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FANG -42.1% vs -50.6%Higher 5y return: FANG +224.9% vs -7.5%
-38%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FANG · RKT

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGRKT
2022+35.3%-46.2%
2023+19.7%+106.9%
2024+10.3%-22.2%
2025-5.6%+81.7%
2026+35.7%-26.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FANG and RKT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and RKT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FANG and RKT is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.48 over 1 year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is RKT a good diversifier for FANG?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-rkt.json

FANG vs RKT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25FANG vs RKT-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FANG vs RKT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-rkt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-rkt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · RKT correlations