PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs QQQ

FANG vs QQQ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) carry a correlation of 0.05, a near-zero link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.05
near-zero
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
30.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and QQQ?

Over the past 3 years, FANG and QQQ moved with a correlation of 0.05, which is near zero, meaning they move largely independently. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.35 versus 0.05 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 30.8 %².

Within FANG's tracked universe of 41 assets, QQQ comes in at #30 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance FANG holds a 13.3-point edge, +39.6% against +26.3%. This link changes with the market regime, having swung between -0.36 and 0.37 on a rolling one-year basis. Note the risk asymmetry: FANG runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs QQQ: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust)
1-year return+39.6%+26.3%
5-year return+224.9%+95.4%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%19.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.321.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-22.8%
Market cap$56.1B
P/E (trailing)38.0
Dividend yield2.13%0.44%
Expense ratio0.18%
Assets under management$452.8B
Sector / categoryEnergyETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: FANG 2.13% vs 0.44%Smaller drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs -42.1%Higher 5y return: FANG +224.9% vs +95.4%

QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.

-2%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FANG · QQQ

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGQQQ
2022+35.3%-32.6%
2023+19.7%+54.9%
2024+10.3%+25.6%
2025-5.6%+20.8%
2026+35.7%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

A structural note: 0.25% of QQQ is FANG itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.

Are FANG and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at 0.05, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and QQQ?

The FANG/QQQ correlation stands at 0.05 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.35, 5 years: 0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QQQ a good diversifier for FANG?

Yes: at 0.05, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of 0.05 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-qqq.json

FANG vs QQQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.05FANG vs QQQ0.05

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FANG vs QQQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-qqq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-qqq/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · QQQ correlations