PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs NRT

FANG vs NRT: Correlation

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and North European Oil Royality Trust (NRT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.41.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.41
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
718.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and NRT?

On 3 years of weekly data the FANG/NRT correlation comes out at 0.41, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.42 over 1 year against 0.41 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.42, and annualized covariance runs at 718.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, NRT places #28 of the 41 assets tracked against FANG. The last year tells two different stories: NRT led by 45.6 percentage points, +39.6% for FANG against +85.2% for NRT. One caveat on sizing: NRT is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs NRT: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)NRT (North European Oil Royality Trust)
1-year return+39.6%+85.2%
5-year return+224.9%+131.5%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.32-0.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-66.1%
Market cap$56.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)38.08.4
Dividend yield2.13%11.95%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Lower P/E: NRT 8.4 vs 38.0Higher yield: NRT 11.95% vs 2.13%Smaller drawdown: FANG -42.1% vs -66.1%Higher 5y return: FANG +224.9% vs +131.5%
-1%0%+107%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FANG · NRT

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGNRT
2022+35.3%+41.9%
2023+19.7%-46.5%
2024+10.3%-25.3%
2025-5.6%+88.4%
2026+35.7%+41.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FANG and NRT good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and NRT?

The FANG/NRT correlation stands at 0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.42, 5 years: 0.42), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NRT a good diversifier for FANG?

A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-nrt.json

FANG vs NRT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.41FANG vs NRT0.41

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FANG vs NRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-nrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-nrt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · NRT correlations