PairBook
HomeFANG › FANG vs MKZR

FANG vs MKZR: Correlation

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.27.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-885.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FANG and MKZR?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FANG and MKZR correlate at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.25 over 1 year against -0.27 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -885.7 %².

Out of 41 assets tracked against FANG, MKZR lands near the bottom at #37. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FANG outperformed by 115.3 percentage points (+39.6% for FANG against -75.7% for MKZR). Note the risk asymmetry: MKZR runs 2.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FANG vs MKZR: side by side

FANG (Diamondback Energy)MKZR (MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.)
1-year return+39.6%-75.7%
5-year return+224.9%n/a
Volatility (ann.)34.1%91.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.320.74
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.1%-97.8%
Market cap$56.1B
P/E (trailing)38.0
Dividend yield2.13%0.00%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: FANG 2.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FANG -42.1% vs -97.8%
-82%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FANG · MKZR

Year-by-year returns

YearFANGMKZR
2022+35.3%
2023+19.7%
2024+10.3%
2025-5.6%-86.7%
2026+35.7%-63.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FANG and MKZR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FANG and MKZR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FANG and MKZR is -0.27 over 3 years, -0.25 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MKZR a good diversifier for FANG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fang-vs-mkzr.json

FANG vs MKZR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27FANG vs MKZR-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FANG vs MKZR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fang-vs-mkzr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fang-vs-mkzr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FANG correlations · MKZR correlations