PairBook
HomeDZZ › DZZ vs WRLD

DZZ vs WRLD: Correlation

DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DZZ) and World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-937.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DZZ and WRLD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DZZ and WRLD correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.25). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.20, with an annualized covariance of -937.2 %².

Among the 73 assets we track against DZZ, WRLD ranks #40 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WRLD ahead by 18.9 points (-8.6% versus +10.3%). One caveat on sizing: DZZ is 2.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DZZ vs WRLD: side by side

DZZ (DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038)WRLD (World Acceptance Corporation)
1-year return-8.6%+10.3%
5-year return-40.0%+0.7%
Volatility (ann.)89.0%42.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.361.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.1%-37.3%
Market cap$0.9B
P/E (trailing)24.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: WRLD -37.3% vs -83.1%Higher 5y return: WRLD +0.7% vs -40.0%
-30%0%+254%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. DZZ · WRLD

Year-by-year returns

YearDZZWRLD
2022+3.0%-73.1%
2023-8.3%+98.0%
2024-35.0%-13.9%
2025+132.7%+24.9%
2026-57.2%+35.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DZZ and WRLD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DZZ and WRLD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.46 over the last year and -0.20 over 5 years.

Is WRLD a good diversifier for DZZ?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dzz-vs-wrld.json

DZZ vs WRLD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25DZZ vs WRLD-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DZZ vs WRLD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dzz-vs-wrld.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dzz-vs-wrld/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DZZ correlations · WRLD correlations