PairBook
HomeDZZ › DZZ vs TR

DZZ vs TR: Correlation

DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DZZ) and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
-746.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DZZ and TR?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DZZ and TR correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.54) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.33). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.25, with an annualized covariance of -746.1 %².

Within DZZ's tracked universe of 73 assets, TR comes in at #67 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance TR holds a 12.7-point edge, -8.6% against +4.1%. One caveat on sizing: DZZ is 3.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DZZ vs TR: side by side

DZZ (DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038)TR (Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.)
1-year return-8.6%+4.1%
5-year return-40.0%+57.7%
Volatility (ann.)89.0%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.360.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.1%-20.0%
Market cap$3.1B
P/E (trailing)32.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.84%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: TR 0.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TR -20.0% vs -83.1%Higher 5y return: TR +57.7% vs -40.0%
-13%0%+254%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DZZ · TR

Year-by-year returns

YearDZZTR
2022+3.0%+22.3%
2023-8.3%-18.8%
2024-35.0%+1.4%
2025+132.7%+17.9%
2026-57.2%+15.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DZZ and TR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, DZZ and TR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DZZ and TR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DZZ and TR is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.54 over 1 year and -0.25 over 5 years.

Is TR a good diversifier for DZZ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, DZZ and TR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dzz-vs-tr.json

DZZ vs TR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33DZZ vs TR-0.33

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DZZ vs TR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dzz-vs-tr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dzz-vs-tr/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DZZ correlations · TR correlations