DZZ vs INTG: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DZZ) and The Intergroup Corporation (INTG) carry a correlation of 0.30, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are DZZ and INTG?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DZZ and INTG correlate at 0.30, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.40) than the 3-year average (0.30). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.26, with an annualized covariance of 1633.3 %².
Among the 73 assets we track against DZZ, INTG ranks #6 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with INTG ahead by 148.0 points (-8.6% versus +139.4%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
DZZ vs INTG: side by side
| DZZ (DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038) | INTG (The Intergroup Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -8.6% | +139.4% |
| 5-year return | -40.0% | -26.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 89.0% | 61.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.36 | 0.19 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -83.1% | -71.1% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | DZZ | INTG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +3.0% | -7.6% |
| 2023 | -8.3% | -58.3% |
| 2024 | -35.0% | -27.4% |
| 2025 | +132.7% | +98.9% |
| 2026 | -57.2% | +23.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are DZZ and INTG good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.30, DZZ and INTG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between DZZ and INTG?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DZZ and INTG is 0.30 over 3 years, 0.40 over 1 year and 0.26 over 5 years.
Is INTG a good diversifier for DZZ?
Reasonably. At 0.30, DZZ and INTG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.30 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dzz-vs-intg.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dzz-vs-intg/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: DZZ correlations · INTG correlations
